How these cognitive errors deceive us when playing roulette.
It’s the tendency to judge the probability of an event based on how representative or "normal" it looks, instead of relying on actual data. For example, if you see the sequence red, black, red, black, you might think “red should come next” because it seems like a balanced pattern.
Players often expect short-term results to reflect long-term probabilities. But roulette can show long, random streaks without following any apparent logic.
This bias leads us to believe that a sequence “can’t continue” for long — which is false. The wheel doesn’t remember past outcomes.
This is the phenomenon where, after extreme results, future outcomes tend to move closer to the average.
For example, if black comes up 10 times in a row, many players believe red must be "due." But roulette doesn’t guarantee balance — each spin is independent.
These beliefs mix representativeness bias with a flawed understanding of regression to the mean.
Recognizing these biases helps avoid mental traps. Roulette is random and doesn’t follow human-like patterns. What has happened doesn’t affect what comes next.
💬 View comments (0) ▼